What's wrong with this picture?
It takes a a bit of staring before you see it. Don't give up too soon! It should pop out at you after about half a minute.
Credit to Wired.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Humans—smart enough to have ideas; foolish enough to believe them
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(226)
-
▼
April
(36)
- Insect colonies as prototypical dynamic entities
- Filling in the reductionist blind spot
- Edward Luttwak on the Middle East
- The terms of the political debate have changed
- Change is about density, not acceleration
- David Sloan Wilson's new book
- Is computer science just modeling?
- What does religion say about the natural world?
- Word of the day: vector check
- Abstraction, analysis, and patterns
- Word of the day: deep dive
- Limbo is a reductio ad absurdum
- Word of the day: to task; tasker
- What is abstraction?
- It's unbelievable to me that people take this seri...
- Word of the day: exfiltrate
- Rosa Brooks, "We're not all victims"
- Computer science, mathematics, and abstraction
- The unreasonable effectiveness …
- Andrew Sullivan on Faith
- Power, status, and age
- Computer Science, Mathematics, and abstraction
- How much do you have to know to watch a movie?
- How things work
- A civil claims market
- Market effects
- Facebook | Terms of Sale
- Where Do Our Tax Dollars Go?
- Religion and government
- Dimensions of human experience
- Sociable Darwinism
- Mathematics and abstraction
- Faith
- The Drug Wars
- The joys of software
- This is terrible
-
▼
April
(36)
1 comment:
It's a flash movie, that's what's wrong with it.
Post a Comment