Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Humans—smart enough to have ideas; foolish enough to believe them
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(436)
-
▼
July
(43)
- Nanoparticles bearing genes
- $1.5 Billion Giveaway to Halliburton and Sugar Lan...
- 12 pennies
- Impact of estate tax repeal on the Bush cabinet
- 12 pennies
- When is 100 < 99?
- Meat-Eating Caterpillar:
- Message-Oriented-Middleware as a web service
- Greenspan Rejects Estate Tax Repeal Without Offset...
- "No nudity. No violence. Unspeakable obscenity."
- The paradox of North Korea
- It's about Bush
- Stock market technical analysis
- More peaceful spokespersons
- Showers cause brain damage
- "Cardinal says Catholics can believe that God guid...
- Who speaks for peaceful Islam?
- 256MB Flash Drive for $31,95 — with key ring link
- Useless Piles of Cash
- Catholic belief
- Yet another power curve
- JavaOne 2005
- The Wally Reflector
- The impulse for meaning
- The Terasem Movement, Inc.
- Vegetarian beef?
- Finding meaning in evolution?
- Are unions making a comeback in public opinion?
- African poverty
- Unintended consequences department: evolving small...
- Is it Rove?
- Stop the NRA
- Reform the Patriot Act
- Risk privatization
- Criminal ethics
- Tell FirstGroup to Cease US Union-Busting
- Food Freedom?
- Podcasts
- Another way Bush and his conservative cronies are ...
- How Bush is tarnishing history
- Another place to sign up to defend the court
- Supreme court nominee
- Pollack and Krugman on Iraq
-
▼
July
(43)
3 comments:
when you're taking 100 as a binary number and 99 as decimal?
No, but here are two hints.
1. It involves a kitchen appliance.
2. 99 is 65% more than 100.
On the microwave. 99 runs for a minute and 39 seconds, but 100 runs for one minute.
Post a Comment