Sunday, February 14, 2010

Adding DNAv4 to DNAv3

From New Scientist
Jason Chin at the University of Cambridge and his colleagues have now redesigned the cell's machinery so that it reads the genetic code in quadruplets. …

To achieve this, the team had to redesign three pieces of the cellular machinery that make proteins.

But they didn't stop there. The team went on to prove their new genetic code works by assigning two "unnatural" amino acids to their quadruplet codons, and incorporated them into a protein chain.

"It's the beginning of a parallel genetic code," says Chin.

What's more, they've shown that these amino acids can react with each other to form a different kind of chemical bond to those which usually hold proteins together in their three-dimensional shape.

The normal kind of bonds – disulphide bonds – can be broken by changes in heat and acidity, causing proteins to lose their 3D structure. This, for instance, is why egg whites change colour and texture when cooked: as the albumen in the whites loses its structure, its physical appearance is transformed.

But the bonds created between Chin's new amino acids are stronger – and so could allow proteins to work in a much wider range of environments. This could help make drugs that can be taken orally without being destroyed by the acids in the digestive tract, for instance.

But that's just the beginning. In the longer term it might be possible to create cells that produce entirely new polymers, such as plastic-like materials. Organisms made of these cells could incorporate the stronger polymers and become stronger or more adaptable as a result.
Here's how The Scientist.com puts it.
Scientists have developed a new genetic language using a ribosome that can read instructions that are 4 base pairs long [rather than the three that are found in nature], enabling the construction of designer proteins containing a variety of unnatural elements, according to a study published online today (February 14) in Nature. …

[Using 3 base pairs there is only] one spare codon to work with. [As a result] scientists have largely been restricted to incorporating only one such unit per protein.

To overcome this limitation, synthetic biologist Jason Chin of the Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, UK, and his colleagues decided to devise a system that could read codons that are 4 base pairs long. Such a system could "open the door to what will be [the] truly revolutionary possibility [of creating] genetically coded polymers comprised of up to 256 [unique] building blocks."

The problem was that normal ribosomes -- which translate 3-base codons into any of the 22 naturally occurring amino acids -- don't read such quadruplet codons, at least not usually. Furthermore, the team couldn't simply manipulate the existing ribosomes, as they are responsible for producing all of the cell's proteins that are required for its survival; altering this system could quickly cause a cellular collapse. Their solution: make a whole new ribosome.

A few years ago, the researchers created the new ribosome, known as an orthogonal ribosome, by altering the region that recognizes the ribosome-binding sequence of the messenger RNA (mRNA). They then created special mRNAs with complementary binding regions to this new sequence, which the orthogonal ribosome selectively bound to and read, leaving natural mRNAs to be recognized only by the natural ribosomes.

"Now you've got two ribosomes -- one reading a new message and [the] normal ribosome" reading the old messages, Chin explained. "That's the basis of how you would write a parallel genetic code in the cell."

With the two ribosomes systems working independently, the researchers could then manipulate the orthogonal ribosome without disrupting normal cellular function. In the present study, they did just that, inducing mutations in the ribosome where the tRNA and mRNA molecules interact in hopes of creating a ribosome that could read quadruplet codons with comparable efficiency and accuracy to that of natural protein synthesis.

To test their mutated ribosomes, the team put them in bacterial cultures growing on a medium containing antibiotics, and provided the cells with an antibiotic resistance gene that included a 4-base codon. Ribosomes that could read the quadruplet codon successfully produced the antibiotic resistance protein, and survived even in the presence of high concentrations of the antibiotic. Those that couldn't read the quadruplet, couldn't create the protein to protect themselves from the antibiotic and died as a result. "In the end we get cells that are surviving this selection pressure," Chin said, and in those cells are ribosomes that can successfully read quadruplet codons.

The new ribosome can still read triplet codons as well, Chin added, but it preferentially reads the 4-base sequences. In this way, the ribosome can still incorporate natural amino acids as well as modified units attached to the amber codon.

But now with the ability to read the quadruplet codons, scientists can easily create proteins with more than one unnatural unit. Using the amber codon and a quadruplet codon to code for two different unnatural amino acids, the researchers generated a protein, synthesized by the new ribosome, that contained both unnatural units.
In many ways this is similar to the move from IPv4 to IPv6 in Internet addressing. (See here and here). It creates a much collection of potential addresses, which therefore can refer to a much larger space of things. In the Internet case the things are distinct items that can have their own internet address. In the DNA case the things are proteins that DNA can be interpreted as referring to.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Slumburbia


By Timothy Egan in the Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com
Look at the cities with stable and recovering home markets. On [the Pacific] coast, San Francisco, Portland, Seattle and San Diego come to mind. All of these cities have fairly strict development codes, trying to hem in their excess sprawl. Developers, many of them, hate these restrictions. They said the coastal cities would eventually price the middle class out, and start to empty.

It hasn’t happened. Just the opposite. The developers’ favorite role models, the laissez faire free-for-alls — Las Vegas, the Phoenix metro area, South Florida, this valley — are the most troubled, the suburban slums.

Come see: this is what happens when money and market, alone, guide the way we live.

Sunday, February 07, 2010

Obama to Hold Bipartisan Summit on Health Care

From NYTimes.com
President Obama said Sunday that he will convene a half-day, bipartisan health care summit at the White House on Feb. 25 to be broadcast on television, so Americans can see Democrats and Republicans try to break the deadlock on health care legislation.
Fantastic! The challenge will be to make it something other than Republican grandstanding. He will have to show the country that he is serious about both health care and about bi-partisan cooperation and that the Republicans are serious about neither.

Here, for example, is what the leader of the Republicans said.
Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, said he welcomed the bipartisan meeting on health care and called on the president to begin the dialogue “by shelving the current health spending bill.”

“The fact is Senate Republicans held hundreds of town halls and met with their constituents across the country last year on the need for health care reform, outlining ideas for the step-by-step approach that Americans have asked for,” Mr. McConnell said in a statement. “And we know there are a number of issues with bipartisan support that we can start with when the 2,700-page bill is put on the shelf.”
Obama said that he does not intend to start from scratch but that he is interested in listening to (and incorporating) any good ideas presented by Republicans. It will be up to him to ensure that the meeting stays focused and operates as a working session to discuss specific issues and that it not get dragged into the kind of demagoguery the Republicans thrive on.

I hope he succeeds. I suspect that this step will improve his public ratings. His critics will argue that his rating are improved (if they are) because he is reaching out to Republicans. I don't think so. If there is an improvement, it will be because he is seen as finally taking some action. In this case the action is putting it to the Republicans: put up or shut up. After that challenge is met, we can then move on and actually get a bill passed.

A molecular millisecond

By Brian Hayes
In the living cell, biological macromolecules do not sit immobile like bronze statues. They are machines with moving parts; they continually flex and wiggle, mesh and then disengage, spin, flap, bend, stretch; all day long they do a hyperkinetic hokey-pokey.

I have now seen a remarkable performance of that molecular dance. In a talk at Harvard earlier this week David E. Shaw showed two videos, each portraying about a millisecond in the life of a single protein molecule. A millisecond may not sound like much, but the video was created by computing atomic motions at roughly one step per femtosecond. That’s 1012 steps in all. (If you included all the steps in the video, and displayed them at 60 frames per second, the show would go on for 500 years.) …

Watching them in the lecture hall, I was so bedazzled that I neglected to note the identity of the molecules. One was an ion channel, a protein that spans the width of a membrane and controls the passage of some specific ion (potassium, I think, in this case). We watched the six polypeptide strands twisting closed like the blades of a camera iris, shutting off the channel. Another simulation showed an even more dramatic reconfiguration. For many microseconds of biological time, and perhaps half a minute of wall-clock time, the protein sat nervously quivering and fidgeting, hunched up in a compact globule, with occasional minor adjustments to various loops and corners. And then suddenly the whole molecule opened up like a flower blooming; a moment later it closed again. If I understand correctly what Shaw was telling us, the existence of this alternative state had been known from experimental evidence, but the transformation had never been seen before. And, as he remarked early in the talk, “seeing what it looks like” brings a level of understanding that would be hard to achieve by more analytic methods.

Ethical behavior


By Andrew Olendzki in Removing the Thorn | Tricycle Magazine.
According to the Buddha, the human world is protected by twin guardians, two forces in the mind that watch over and guide moral behavior. The first guardian of the world is hiri, a word that connotes conscience, moral intuition, and self-respect. It refers to that within the human psyche that knows the difference between right and wrong, between what is noble and ignoble, between what is worthy of respect and what is not. Each of us has within us an innate moral compass, and it is the view of the Buddhist tradition that religion is not the source of this but rather a form by which it is given expression. The second guardian of the world is ottappa, which comprises such notions as social conscience, a cultural or collective sense of morality, and respect for the opinions and the rights of others.

Buddhism teaches that anything we do that is wholesome will be done with the support and guidance of these two inner guardians. Conversely, everything we do that is unwholesome can only be done when these moral guides are disregarded. So if there is something morally reprehensible occurring in an individual or in a society, it means that we lack sufficient clarity of awareness of what we are doing. It means we are temporarily blinded by our greed, hatred, or delusion, or by some combination of the three, such that we refuse to attend openly to the deeds we are committing. When attention has been brought to bear on the matter—in sufficient amounts, with sufficient intensity, and with sufficient honesty—we will naturally shy away from doing harm to ourselves, to others, and to both.
This distinguishes Buddhism from religions that insist that the only reason people behave ethically is fear of God's punishment.

This is also consistent with current theories of evolutionary biology that explain how individual behaviors and societal norms evolve and are maintained.

Friday, February 05, 2010

Ancient dialect extinct after last speaker dies


From msnbc.com
One of the world's oldest dialects, which traces its origins to tens of thousands of years ago, has become extinct after the last person to speak it died on a remote Indian island.

Boa Sr, the 85-year-old last speaker of 'Bo,' was the oldest member of the Great Andamanese tribe, R.C. Kar, deputy director of Tribal Health in Andaman, told Reuters on Friday.

She died last week in Port Blair, the capital of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which were hit by a devastating tsunami in 2004.

'With the death of Boa Sr and the extinction of the Bo language, a unique part of human society is now just a memory,' said Stephen Corry, director of Survival International, an organization that supports tribes worldwide."
See also The Hindu where the picture is captioned "JNU professor Anvita Abbi with Boa, one of the last surviving speakers of the unique Great Andamanese languages"

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Philips Uday mini solar lantern


Philips Uday mini solar lantern
4-5 hours of bright white light per solar charge
Looks ugly; sounds great. What does it take to give it a full charge?

From Trendwatching.com.

Monday, February 01, 2010

The psychology of power: Absolutely

From The Economist reporting on studies of how people with power behave.
People with power that they think is justified break rules not only because they can get away with it, but also because they feel at some intuitive level that they are entitled to take what they want. This sense of entitlement is crucial to understanding why people misbehave in high office. In its absence, abuses will be less likely. The word “privilege” translates as “private law”. If Dr Lammers and Dr Galinsky are right, the sense which some powerful people seem to have that different rules apply to them is not just a convenient smoke screen. They genuinely believe it.